whoishbs.com

February 6, 2026

What whoishbs.com is trying to do

whoishbs.com is a political campaign website focused almost entirely on Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma (often shortened to “HBS”). The framing is not subtle: the site positions itself as an “Expose Your CM” effort and presents a set of accusations and narratives intended to portray him as corrupt, intimidating, and harmful to Assam’s public life.

Right on the main English page, it uses big, poster-style headings like “10 FACES 1 CORRUPT CM.” and then lays out multiple themed sections. Each section is written like a charge sheet: fear and intimidation, alleged corruption networks, alleged land deals, alleged betrayal of communities, and so on.

The site’s core messages and the claims it highlights

The content is organized into short blocks that read like campaign talking points. A few examples of what it claims:

  • “Politics of Fear and Intimidation”: it alleges that dissent is met with threats, and it specifically mentions journalists being targeted.
  • “Politics for Family, Plunder for Land”: it claims a large “empire” exists in the name of the CM’s wife and son, including “17 companies” and various business interests, plus land acquisition across Assam.
  • “Country’s Most Corrupt CM”: it references a list of scandals (Saradha, NC Hills, Louis Berger, flyover scandals, and others) and alleges daily “crores” being collected via “syndicates” in commodities like coal, sand, stone, and betel nut.
  • “Betrayal of Assam’s Indigenous Communities”: it alleges land transfers and broken promises around ST status for communities, and it frames certain groups as being used as vote banks.

The pattern is consistent: it uses strong language, very high certainty, and often mixes allegations with rhetorical conclusions. The site, at least on the page visible from the main English entry, does not present a linked dossier of sources beside each claim. It tells visitors to “Come back for proof” and labels the effort as an “Ongoing investigation.”

“Raise your voice” features: how it tries to collect participation

A big part of the site isn’t only reading; it’s participation.

There’s a prompt to “Call the number to support this cause” and it displays a phone number prominently. That’s a classic campaign mechanic: convert attention into action quickly, without asking people to do complicated steps.

It also includes a form that asks for a person’s name, phone number, and assembly constituency, plus an upload option for images (JPEG/PNG up to a stated size). The prompt encourages people to submit information about where they have “seen” corruption. The “thank you” message on submission goes further and says the reports will be investigated “as soon as we come to power.”

So the site isn’t pretending to be a neutral civic portal. It’s structured like a political mobilization tool: gather leads, gather supporters, and build a narrative of mass participation.

Who appears to be behind it

The site explicitly labels itself “An Indian National Congress initiative.” That line matters because it clarifies what would otherwise be a common question: is this journalism, activism, satire, or opposition campaigning? The website says it’s an opposition initiative, and the tone matches that.

That doesn’t automatically mean every claim is false or true. It does mean you should interpret the content the same way you would interpret any campaign material: it’s designed to persuade, and it’s going to pick facts and framing that help its side.

What’s missing, and why that matters

From the main page view, there are a few gaps you notice fast:

  1. No visible methodology. It uses “Ongoing investigation” language, but it doesn’t outline how allegations are verified, what standards it uses, or whether submissions are checked before being counted or showcased.
  2. No obvious citations beside claims. The text references many scandals and large numbers, but the page itself doesn’t function like a library of evidence.
  3. No clear privacy/terms surfaced on the page. Because the form requests personal data (phone number, constituency) and accepts uploads, the absence of easy-to-find privacy handling details is a practical concern for users.

If you’re a visitor, the responsible move is to treat it as a campaign intake funnel. Anything you submit could be politically sensitive, and you should assume it may be stored and used for organizing, messaging, or follow-up contact.

What whoishbs.com says about modern political communication in India

Campaign sites like this are built for speed. They compress a complex political argument into swipeable sections and a simple action: call, submit, share. It’s designed to travel on social media, where attention is limited and emotional clarity often wins over nuance.

The “crowdsourcing” angle is also important. Asking people for tips and uploads creates two benefits for campaigners: it can surface real leads, and it can create a feeling that the public is already aligned (“People of Assam have raised their voice…”). Even if submissions are uneven quality, the act of collecting them is itself a political signal.

At the same time, this style of campaigning increases the burden on the public to verify what they’re reading. A visitor who wants accuracy has to step outside the site, look for court records, investigative reporting, official statements, and credible fact-checking, because the page itself is built more like a rally flyer than a research archive.

Key takeaways

  • whoishbs.com is an opposition-facing campaign site that targets Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma with a set of aggressive allegations.
  • It explicitly describes itself as an “Indian National Congress initiative,” so it should be read as partisan political communication, not neutral reporting.
  • The site focuses on short, punchy claim blocks and tries to convert visitors into participants through calls and a submission form.
  • It asks for personal information and uploads; users should be cautious given the lack of prominently displayed privacy handling details on the main page view.

FAQ

Is whoishbs.com an official government website?
No. It presents itself as a political initiative and explicitly associates itself with the Indian National Congress.

What kind of content does it publish?
Primarily accusations and negative framing about Himanta Biswa Sarma, organized into themed sections like intimidation, corruption, land issues, and governance.

Does the site provide proof for the allegations on the main page?
On the main page, it uses “Ongoing investigation” language and asks visitors to return for proof, but it doesn’t show a structured evidence pack next to each claim in the visible layout.

Is it safe to submit your phone number or uploads there?
I can’t judge how they store or use data from the outside. Practically, since it requests phone numbers and accepts image uploads, only submit if you’re comfortable being contacted and if you understand the political sensitivity of what you’re sharing.

How can I verify the claims it mentions?
Use independent reporting, official documents, court filings where relevant, and credible fact-checking sources. Treat the site as a starting point for allegations, not the final authority.