facbook.com

February 25, 2026

What facbook.com is in practice

facbook.com is a classic “typo domain”: one letter missing from facebook.com. People land on it when they mistype the address bar, click a sloppy link, or follow an auto-complete suggestion that’s wrong.

What’s interesting is that facbook.com isn’t some random look-alike domain floating around unmanaged. Public WHOIS data shows it has been registered since March 17, 2005, and the registrant is listed as Meta Platforms, Inc. (Domain Admin), with name servers that match Facebook’s infrastructure (a.ns.facebook.com, b.ns.facebook.com, etc.).

That combination (long-held registration + Facebook-controlled name servers) is usually a strong indicator that the domain is being used defensively: it exists so that user mistakes don’t turn into user harm.

Why a company would buy (and keep) a typo domain

There are a few practical reasons big platforms hold typo domains like facbook.com.

First, it reduces account-takeover risk. If attackers own a typo domain, they can host a near-perfect login page, harvest credentials, and then either immediately take over accounts or sell credentials in bulk. Facebook is a constant phishing target for exactly that reason.

Second, it reduces brand confusion. If a user types facbook.com and sees anything except Facebook, they may assume Facebook is broken, hacked, or shady. That perception damage happens fast and is hard to unwind.

Third, it’s cheap insurance. Keeping one extra .com registration is trivial compared to the cost of even a single well-run phishing campaign, or the customer support burden that comes from “I typed the site and it looked weird.”

You’ll also see brands do this with other common mistakes: swapped letters, missing letters, extra letters, or lookalike country domains.

The redirect angle: what users usually experience

A lot of defensive typo domains are configured to redirect to the real site. Multiple sources point to facbook.com as an example of a domain that forwards users to facebook.com.

Under the hood, the exact behavior can change over time: sometimes it’s a straight redirect to the homepage, sometimes to a localized page, sometimes to a login flow, sometimes it’s handled differently on mobile vs desktop. But the user-level goal stays consistent: “If you made a small mistake, you end up at the right destination without thinking about it.”

One subtle point: redirects can also help search engines avoid indexing duplicate or confusing pages. A “permanent” redirect pattern is often used to consolidate traffic to one canonical domain, though the specific implementation for facbook.com isn’t something I can reliably confirm from my side because direct fetches of the domain failed in my environment. (That’s an access limitation here, not proof of anything about the domain itself.)

Security reality: typo domains are heavily abused, even if this one looks controlled

Even though facbook.com appears to be held by Meta, the broader pattern is still worth taking seriously: typo domains are a standard phishing technique. Security writeups and research papers explicitly call out spoofed or “homoglyphic” domains (including facbook.com as an example string attackers might use) as a way to bypass human attention and sometimes even automated filters.

So the safe mental model is:

• facbook.com specifically: likely intended as a defensive asset, given WHOIS and nameservers.
• typo domains generally: high-risk category; many are malicious or become malicious after ownership changes.

Also, there’s noise online. Some “is this site safe” scanners flag facbook.com as suspicious with low trust scores, while others claim it’s fine. Those scanners are often heuristic-driven and can disagree wildly, especially when a domain sometimes redirects, sometimes blocks bots, or behaves differently by region.

How to handle links to facbook.com in the real world

If you personally typed facbook.com and it drops you into Facebook normally, that’s consistent with the defensive redirect story. But if you received a link (email, DM, SMS) pointing to facbook.com, you should still slow down a bit.

A few practical checks that actually catch real attacks:

• Don’t sign in from the link. Open a new tab and type facebook.com yourself, or use your saved bookmark.
• Look at the full address bar before you enter credentials. Phishing pages often use subdomains or long paths to distract you (example pattern: facbook.com.something-else.tld or a totally different domain that merely contains “facbook” in it).
• Turn on two-factor authentication (2FA) so a password leak is less likely to become a full account takeover. Facebook-targeted phishing is common, and 2FA changes the payoff for attackers.

If you’re managing a business page or ad account, the stakes go up. Those are frequent targets because the attacker can steal payment methods, run ads, or extort access.

What facbook.com tells you about Meta’s broader domain strategy

Meta owning facbook.com fits a bigger brand-protection pattern: large consumer platforms register misspellings, short domains, and legacy names to reduce user error and close off obvious attacker infrastructure.

There are public examples of Facebook pursuing lookalike domains through dispute processes as well, particularly where the domain appears designed to confuse users or capture logins.

This stuff isn’t glamorous, but it’s one of those quiet layers that makes the web slightly less hostile for normal people who just want to log in and move on.

Key takeaways

• facbook.com is a typo variant of facebook.com, and WHOIS records list Meta Platforms, Inc. as registrant with Facebook name servers.
• Many brands register typo domains defensively to reduce phishing, fraud, and support burden.
• Multiple sources describe facbook.com as redirecting to facebook.com, which matches defensive use.
• Even if this specific domain looks controlled, typo domains as a category are a common phishing technique, so links to them should still be treated cautiously.

FAQ

Is facbook.com “official”?

“Official” is a fuzzy word, but the publicly visible WHOIS registration details associate facbook.com with Meta Platforms, Inc., and it uses Facebook-controlled name servers. That strongly suggests it’s under the same operational umbrella.

Why do some checker sites call facbook.com dangerous?

Automated trust/scam scanners can disagree because they rely on heuristics (redirect behavior, hosting signals, historical reports, bot-access patterns). Some flag it harshly; others don’t. They’re a data point, not a verdict.

If it redirects to Facebook, is it always safe to log in there?

It’s safer than a random lookalike domain, but the best habit is still: don’t log in from links. Open Facebook directly from a typed URL or bookmark, especially if the link came from a message. Facebook phishing is common and keeps evolving.

Could facbook.com ever become risky in the future?

Yes. Domains can change hands, DNS can be reconfigured, and infrastructure can shift. The reason to build “type the real domain yourself” habits is that they keep working even when details change.