wewillwrite.com
WeWillWrite.com is a classroom writing game that helps students write fast, read peer work, and learn through friendly team play.
What is WeWillWrite.com?
WeWillWrite is a web platform made for teachers and students in elementary, middle, and high school.
Its main goal is to make writing feel social, safe, and fun.
The company says students learn better when they enjoy writing with other people.
The platform was built in Norway and tested in the United States and Canada before its wider launch.
Its founder, Daniel Senn, also created the reading game Poio, which Kahoot bought in 2019, while other team members have backgrounds in teaching, game design, child safety, and technology, according to the company’s story page.
How does the writing game work?
A teacher starts by choosing a set of writing challenges from the platform’s library.
The teacher can also change a challenge or create a new one.
Students enter the session with a PIN and their names, so they do not need personal accounts or passwords.
The teacher can see each student’s identity, but classmates see anonymous writing.
Students are placed in random teams and receive short prompts that may ask them to tell a story, explain an idea, or use a writing skill.
Each writing round normally lasts between two and five minutes.
Students can see small parts of their teammates’ work while they write, which may help them find new ideas.
Team members then read anonymous answers and vote for their favorite text.
The strongest texts reach a final class vote, where the teacher can stop and discuss why each piece works.
A classroom report describes how students quickly use skills such as metaphors, sound words, and strong adjectives after seeing those skills in winning texts.
Why can the format make students want to write?
WeWillWrite turns writing into a short group event instead of a long private task.
This change matters because a blank page can feel less scary when the task lasts only a few minutes.
Anonymous sharing can also help students take risks without worrying that classmates will judge their name.
The team score gives students a shared goal, while the final vote gives each short text a real audience.
An independent classroom review found that the fast pace, peer reading, and clear audience helped students stay focused and produce direct writing.
The same teacher review also praised the platform as a quick way to collect work that teachers can study later.
The best feature may be the fast learning loop, because students write, see an example, hear feedback, and try again within the same lesson.
How does WeWillWrite help teachers?
The platform gives teachers a simple view of what the whole class can do.
Teachers can watch student work during the game and identify skills that need more practice.
Completed texts are stored in the portal’s Student Texts area, according to the help center.
Teachers can print or reuse those texts for editing, longer assignments, portfolios, or later lessons.
WeWillWrite says its challenge library supports Common Core English Language Arts standards and other state standards.
Its teaching model combines short writing bursts, peer review, teacher feedback, group discussion, and game play, as explained on its pedagogy page.
This makes the platform most useful as a lesson starter, practice activity, or quick check of student understanding.
What role does artificial intelligence play?
The writing prompts are made by people, not generated by artificial intelligence.
AI is used to examine student writing and point out literary tools such as hooks, similes, metaphors, and descriptive words.
The teacher can show these findings during the final discussion.
This use of AI supports the teacher instead of writing an answer for the student.
That difference is important because students still create every sentence themselves.
The platform also uses pre-generated AI images to support some challenges.
Teachers should still check the AI findings because software can miss context or label a writing choice incorrectly.
What are the main limits?
WeWillWrite is not a full writing course.
Short rounds help students begin quickly, but they do not provide enough time for deep research, careful structure, revision, or a long finished piece.
Fast typists may also have an advantage over students who type slowly or need accessibility support.
Competition can motivate many students, yet students whose work never reaches the final may feel left out.
Teachers can reduce this risk by praising clear growth, strong ideas, and brave choices instead of only praising winners.
The independent review recommends using short texts as “seeds” that students later expand into larger work.
The platform works best when it adds energy to writing lessons without replacing quiet drafting, editing, direct teaching, and personal feedback.
Is WeWillWrite safe for students?
Students join with a PIN and do not need their own accounts.
The platform says it filters harmful language and attempts to block students from naming classmates in submitted texts.
Teachers can review texts removed by the filter.
Its privacy policy covers FERPA, COPPA, Canadian privacy rules, AI processing, data security, and international data transfers.
The company says it acts as a school service provider for student data and can sign a data processing agreement with a school or district.
Schools should still review the policy, retention rules, AI processing terms, and accessibility needs before adoption.
How much does it cost?
The Basic plan is free and includes eight selected writing sets each month with some feature limits.
Premium costs $12 per month or $79.99 per year and includes all content, custom content, teacher insights, and AI literary analysis.
A 30-day Premium trial is available.
School licenses use volume pricing and include Premium access for teachers plus priority support.
The service is currently offered only in the United States and Canada.
Who should use WeWillWrite?
WeWillWrite is a strong fit for teachers who want a quick way to increase participation and make writing visible to the whole class.
It may be especially useful for warm-ups, creative practice, skill review, and lessons where students learn by comparing examples.
Its real value is not the timer or scoreboard alone.
Its value comes from making students write, read, discuss, and try again while the lesson is still happening.