saksi bojonegoromaju com

October 25, 2025

Saksi Bojonegoromaju: The Real Work Behind a Fair Election in Bojonegoro

Saksi Bojonegoromaju isn’t about slogans or hashtags. It’s a system of people—real individuals—trained and organized to protect the voting process in Bojonegoro. When local elections come around, these witnesses stand at every polling station (TPS), watch every vote, and make sure the results reflect what voters actually decided. Without them, transparency breaks down, and “Bojonegoro Maju” becomes just another phrase.

What Saksi Bojonegoromaju Actually Does

In every Indonesian election, each candidate pair (Paslon) has to assign witnesses or saksi to polling stations. In Bojonegoro’s 2024 local elections, that role expanded significantly under the “Bojonegoro Maju” movement. These witnesses are more than bystanders—they check ballots, record results, and immediately report irregularities.

At each TPS, there are usually two or more saksi per candidate. They bring copies of the official voter list, keep track of vote counts, and sign off on the final C1 form (the form that summarizes vote results at the station). They are also trained to submit photo documentation of the count, sometimes using apps provided by campaign teams or independent groups.

In 2024, for example, the team of Teguh Haryono—candidate for Bupati Bojonegoro—organized hundreds of saksi across the district. Reports from November 2024 described how these saksi received direct briefings from the candidate, emphasizing discipline and honesty. On the other side, the Wahono–Nurul Azizah pair underlined similar preparation, with their coalition focusing on transparency and fair play.

Why the System Exists

The logic is simple: without witnesses, there’s no real oversight at the micro level. Election commissions (KPU) and supervisors (Bawaslu) can’t monitor every TPS in detail. Saksi fill that gap. They act as independent verifiers. If there’s a mismatch between handwritten tallies and official data, saksi are the ones who raise the alarm.

Bojonegoro has over two thousand TPS. In 2024, party teams deployed approximately 2,120 saksi just for one major coalition. Each person had a specific role—from guarding ballot boxes to double-checking voter attendance sheets.

The system prevents small manipulations that can add up to big problems. Without them, a few unverified discrepancies per station could mean hundreds of votes lost or added by mistake—or intentionally.

How Saksi Bojonegoromaju Are Trained

Training usually starts weeks before the election. Political parties, coalitions, or civic groups invite volunteers to local community halls. In Bojonegoro, the sessions are often organized by BPC HIPMI Bojonegoro, youth groups, or part of campaign teams.

Training covers:

Regulations and procedures. They learn what counts as a valid or invalid vote, how to respond to procedural violations, and what legal documents they must sign.
Communication protocol. Who to report to, how to document incidents, and how to handle tension at polling sites.
Security awareness. Staying neutral in conflict situations, avoiding intimidation, and maintaining personal safety.
Use of digital tools. Many witnesses now send real-time updates through WhatsApp groups or election apps.

Mistakes are common during first-time participation. A saksi might forget to bring a power bank, run out of storage space on their phone for photo evidence, or fail to double-check the C1 form before signing it. Once signed, errors are hard to correct.

Common Problems and What Goes Wrong

Even a well-trained witness can face challenges. Communication delays are one. When mobile signal drops, reports can’t reach the central command in time. Another recurring problem is emotional tension—voters sometimes argue, and saksi get dragged into disputes that should be handled by polling officers.

In a few cases, witnesses were found being too partisan—interfering with the process instead of observing it. That kind of behavior damages credibility. A witness must watch and document, not influence.

Lack of coordination between saksi from different candidates also causes confusion. Each side has the right to a copy of the result form, but in crowded stations, paperwork gets lost or mishandled. A missing form can create disputes during the recapitulation stage at the subdistrict level (PPK).

Why Bojonegoromaju Makes It Different

The “Bojonegoro Maju” approach isn’t just about politics; it reflects a broader push for modernization in the district. Alongside programs like E-Bakul (a digital market platform for local SMEs) and initiatives for clean governance, the saksi framework is part of building trust in institutions.

Local campaigns have started connecting saksi training with civic education. Instead of just teaching witnesses how to watch over votes, organizers now include sessions about data literacy, public accountability, and digital ethics. This helps align democratic participation with Bojonegoro’s economic goals—more awareness, more transparency.

Even local government communication channels, like @humaskabbojonegoro on Instagram, support digital awareness. They showcase civic events, entrepreneurship training, and sometimes clips from election-related activities. It’s all part of making Bojonegoro a district that runs efficiently, not just politically but economically too.

When It Fails

When saksi work is weak, the effects ripple out fast. Election results get contested, counting delays multiply, and people lose trust. In 2019 and 2020 elections, similar districts faced issues like unverified tallies or missing documentation.

For Bojonegoro, where competition between local coalitions can be tight, this risk is significant. If even a small percentage of TPS results are disputed, it can hold up certification for days. It also drains resources—legal teams, verification officers, logistics.

The worst part is public perception. When residents see unclear results or prolonged disputes, they start doubting the fairness of the process. That’s why Bojonegoromaju’s focus on solid saksi systems is critical: the cost of weak oversight is public distrust.

Coordination and Logistics

Each saksi is assigned under a coordinator, usually one per village or cluster of TPS. These coordinators handle supplies—forms, pens, snacks, communication devices, sometimes even raincoats. During the 2024 elections, reports mentioned coordination centers spread across kecamatan like Kapas and Dander.

Some teams used glamping sites or training grounds—such as Jolotundo Glamping & Edupark in Nganjuk—for retreats that combined team building with technical training. It’s practical and symbolic: mixing discipline with motivation.

By the time election day arrives, the structure looks military-like but operates democratically. Orders come in, data goes out, everything logged. It’s not glamorous, but it works.

Lessons for Other Regions

Bojonegoromaju’s saksi framework could serve as a case study for other districts. It shows how decentralized oversight strengthens democracy. Instead of depending solely on the central election body, communities take ownership of accuracy.

However, sustainability is the next challenge. After each election, saksi networks often dissolve. Keeping them engaged between elections—through civic training, youth programs, or local entrepreneurship initiatives—would make the system more consistent.

It’s also important to ensure inclusion. Many saksi come from party structures; expanding participation to nonpartisan citizens, especially young voters, would make oversight more representative.

The Real Impact

After the 2024 Pilkada, reports from multiple media outlets noted that Bojonegoro’s election went relatively smoothly. No major conflicts, minimal disputes, and faster reporting of results compared to neighboring regions. A big part of that came down to well-prepared saksi.

In practical terms, that means more than just political victory. It means election data gets verified accurately. It means transitions happen without prolonged court battles. It means development projects—like small business funding, agricultural innovation, and public infrastructure—don’t stall because of political uncertainty.

That’s the real meaning behind “Bojonegoro Maju.” Progress that starts with accountability.

FAQ

What is Saksi Bojonegoromaju?
It refers to the organized network of election witnesses in Bojonegoro who ensure fair voting and counting processes during local elections.

Who trains the saksi?
Mostly political parties, local civic groups, and campaign teams. Some training is also coordinated with election authorities to ensure compliance with official rules.

How many saksi were involved in 2024?
Around 2,000–2,100 were deployed across all polling stations in Bojonegoro.

What happens if saksi aren’t present?
Without witnesses, vote counting can lack verification. Errors or manipulation may go unchallenged, leading to disputes.

Are saksi paid?
Some receive modest operational allowances; others volunteer. Payment varies depending on the campaign team or organization.

Can ordinary citizens become saksi?
Yes, as long as they meet the basic legal requirements and register through an authorized campaign or civic organization.

What’s next for Bojonegoromaju?
Beyond elections, the framework is being expanded into civic monitoring—encouraging citizens to apply the same vigilance to governance, budgeting, and local development projects.

Saksi Bojonegoromaju isn’t a headline concept—it’s a working structure that keeps Bojonegoro’s democracy intact. The more organized it gets, the stronger the district’s foundation for real progress.