sdcalignersettlement.com

July 2, 2025

SDCAlignerSettlement.com Is A Settlement Portal, Not A Dental Service Site

SDCAlignerSettlement.com is the settlement website for Snow v. Align Technology Inc., a U.S. class action about SmileDirectClub aligners and allegations that Align Technology and SmileDirectClub entered an anticompetitive agreement affecting direct-to-consumer aligner prices.

The site is mainly built for people who bought, paid for, or reimbursed SmileDirectClub aligners for personal use in the United States between October 22, 2017 and August 18, 2022.

It is not a place to buy aligners, restart SmileDirectClub treatment, request dental advice, or complain about treatment quality.

That distinction matters because SmileDirectClub shut down in December 2023, ended its telehealth aligner platform, stopped customer-care support, and told customers to consult local dentists for further treatment.

What The Website Actually Does

The website explains who is included in the settlement, what money may be available, what rights class members give up, and how people can contact the settlement administrator.

The settlement is valued at $31.75 million, and U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria granted final approval on November 21, 2025, according to class counsel Hagens Berman.

The original settlement website FAQ said eligible class members with valid claims were estimated to receive $40 to $60, with payments not lower than $10, depending on the final number of valid claims and deductions.

Hagens Berman’s later FAQ says the current estimate is $80 to $100, still subject to change based on fees, expenses, and the settlement class size.

That change is worth noticing because class action payment estimates often shift after claims are counted.

Why This Settlement Exists

The lawsuit accused Align Technology, the maker of Invisalign, of agreeing not to compete with SmileDirectClub in the direct-to-consumer aligner market, which plaintiffs said allowed SmileDirectClub to charge higher prices.

Align denied wrongdoing, and the court did not decide that Align violated the law before the parties settled.

The case is about alleged competition and pricing behavior, not whether SmileDirectClub aligners worked well or whether a customer had a bad dental result.

That is an important reading of the website because many former SmileDirectClub customers may arrive there looking for refunds, unfinished treatment help, or support after the company’s shutdown.

The settlement site is narrower than that.

The Claim Deadline Has Passed

The claim filing deadline was October 27, 2025, and the settlement website says submissions are no longer being accepted.

The FAQ also said claim forms had to be submitted online or postmarked by that date.

People identified in SmileDirectClub’s records as purchasers were treated as having valid claims and may receive automatic pro rata payments.

People who were not identified in those records needed to file a valid claim by the deadline to receive payment.

So the most practical use of the site now is checking status, reading documents, confirming contact details, and understanding what rights were affected.

The Website Is Useful But Plain

The site is functional rather than persuasive.

It has the usual class action structure: home page, FAQ, document section, contact information, claim page, privacy policy, and terms.

The footer lists Epiq, a large settlement administration company, and gives the settlement administrator’s email and toll-free number.

The contact details are useful because settlement emails can look suspicious, especially when they mention old purchases, payment methods, or class action claims.

The administrator email shown on the site is info@SDCAlignerSettlement.com, and the toll-free number is 1-888-788-8304.

What Users Should Watch Carefully

The first thing to check is whether a message links to the exact settlement website and does not ask for unusual information.

A real settlement administrator may need payment routing choices or address confirmation, but users should be cautious with any message asking for passwords, bank logins, Social Security numbers, or upfront fees.

The settlement process does not require class members to pay lawyers directly, since class counsel works on a contingency basis and fees come from the settlement fund if approved by the court.

Another thing to watch is the rights release.

The settlement website says people who remain in the class give up the right to sue Align and released parties over the legal claims resolved by the settlement.

Hagens Berman says the lawsuit does not concern product defects or harms from SmileDirectClub aligner treatment, and remaining in the class does not release unrelated claims against SDC about product quality or treatment experiences.

That is a very practical detail for former customers who had unfinished treatment or medical complaints.

Why The All-Cash Settlement Matters

Earlier proposed settlement terms were controversial because they included coupons for Invisalign products.

Reuters reported that Judge Chhabria rejected a prior $27.5 million proposal in February 2025 because he was concerned that coupons would direct more customers to the alleged monopolist.

Reuters later reported that the renewed settlement was all cash and did not include a coupon component.

That makes the current settlement easier for ordinary consumers to understand.

Cash is simpler than product coupons, especially in a market where many class members may no longer want aligner treatment.

Who The Website Is Best For

The site is best for U.S. SmileDirectClub aligner purchasers from the eligible period who want to know whether they are included, whether they filed correctly, and how payment distribution works.

It is also useful for people who received a notice and want to verify that the notice is tied to a real court-approved settlement.

It is less useful for people outside the United States, people who bought non-SmileDirectClub aligners, or people whose main issue is clinical harm.

Class counsel’s FAQ says the case focused on an alleged restriction on Align’s ability to compete in the United States and that counsel is not currently aware of similar wrongdoing outside the U.S.

Key Takeaways

SDCAlignerSettlement.com is the official settlement website for the Snow v. Align Technology case involving SmileDirectClub aligner purchasers and Align Technology.

The settlement received final approval on November 21, 2025, and the claim deadline has already passed.

Eligible class members may receive pro rata cash payments, with the amount depending on valid claims, fees, expenses, and administration costs.

The case is about alleged anticompetitive pricing conduct, not dental injuries, treatment defects, or unfinished SmileDirectClub care.

The safest way to verify a notice is to use the contact details listed on the settlement website rather than trusting links in unexpected emails.

FAQ

Is SDCAlignerSettlement.com legitimate?

Yes, it is the settlement website referenced by class counsel and tied to Snow v. Align Technology Inc., and it lists Epiq as the settlement administrator.

Can I still file a claim?

No, the claim deadline was October 27, 2025, and the claim page says submissions are closed.

How much money will people receive?

The earlier settlement-site FAQ estimated $40 to $60 and at least $10, while Hagens Berman’s updated FAQ estimates $80 to $100, with the final amount depending on deductions and the number of valid claims.

Do automatic payments apply to everyone?

No, automatic payments apply to class members identified in SmileDirectClub’s purchaser records, while people not identified in those records had to file a valid claim before the deadline.

Does this settlement fix SmileDirectClub treatment problems?

No, the case is focused on alleged anticompetitive conduct between Align and SmileDirectClub, not product defects or dental treatment harm.