saveourostriches com
Why 400 Healthy Ostriches Might Be Killed in Canada—and Why People Are Furious
A family-run ostrich farm in British Columbia is fighting a government-ordered mass cull of 400 perfectly healthy birds. The CFIA says it's about disease control. The farm—and thousands of supporters—say it’s madness. Here’s why this bizarre standoff matters more than it seems.
The Short Version: 400 Ostriches, 1 Virus, 0 Common Sense?
Back in December 2024, Universal Ostrich Farms had a serious problem: a few dozen ostriches died suddenly. Lab tests found H5N1 avian influenza in two of the dead birds. That’s the highly pathogenic kind, the same strain that’s wreaked havoc on poultry farms globally.
Now, if this had been chickens, standard protocol would’ve kicked in automatically: kill the flock. All of them. It’s part of a global “stamping out” policy designed to stop viruses before they spread. That’s how countries like Canada prevent pandemics jumping from animals to humans.
But this wasn’t chickens. These were ostriches. Massive, hardy, long-lived birds that showed signs of recovering naturally—something rare when H5N1 is involved. The farm believes their flock developed resistance. And here’s the kicker: none of the surviving 400 birds have tested positive since.
Still, the CFIA ordered the full cull.
The Farm's Response: “You’re Killing Healthy Animals”
Universal Ostrich Farms pushed back—hard. They hired lawyers, went to court, started a full-blown advocacy campaign under the name Save Our Ostriches. There’s a website, social pages, a petition, legal funds, and a loud online community.
Their core argument? These birds are fine now. Killing them isn’t just unnecessary—it’s anti-science. They say the CFIA is stuck in rigid policy without considering updated test results, context, or even the unique biology of ostriches.
Think of it like this: you cut your finger, get a tetanus shot, and heal. Six months later, someone demands you be hospitalized because “you had an injury.” That’s how the farm sees this cull.
What the Court Said
In May 2025, Federal Court Justice Russell Zinn shot down the farm’s challenge. Not because he thought the ostriches were sick. But because the CFIA followed its rules, and those rules were legally sound. The judge basically said: look, I get it—but the agency has authority here. Judges don’t rewrite disease-control policy on the fly.
That was a blow to the farm. But they didn’t stop. They filed an appeal, which is now being heard. And the ostriches are still alive—for now.
Why This Isn't Just a Local Farm Story
This is way bigger than a rural dispute over birds.
For one, it’s a test case of how Canada handles animal disease outbreaks—especially when the facts on the ground don’t match the worst-case scenario playbook. Does the system have room for nuance? Or is it all or nothing?
Then there’s the research angle. The farm says ostrich eggs could be valuable in creating antibodies for future treatments. Killing the flock means throwing that away. Supporters argue it’s short-sighted.
And, of course, there’s the ethical question. If the birds are healthy, is mass euthanasia acceptable just because the system says so?
Enter the Americans
This whole situation caught international attention when Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Dr. Oz, and New York billionaire John Catsimatidis stepped in. Not joking—they offered to relocate the ostriches to Florida.
They framed it as a “rescue mission.” Let the birds live out their days on Oz’s Florida ranch, away from Canadian regulators. Whether you love or hate these figures, it turned the whole thing into a cross-border drama.
The CFIA didn’t exactly welcome the offer. Disease control doesn’t stop at borders, and once birds are exposed, moving them is an international logistics nightmare. But the optics? That was huge.
The Public Backlash
Thousands of people have joined the fight online. The farm’s social media campaign has gone viral, with hashtags like #SaveOurOstriches and images of curious, towering birds peeking into cameras. It’s easy to get behind—because nobody wants to see animals slaughtered when they look perfectly fine.
But not all the attention has been positive. Some critics have flagged ties between the campaign and fringe conspiracy groups. The online chatter sometimes veers into territory that sounds less about ostriches and more about broader distrust in government and science. That muddies the message.
Still, the core point remains: is this mass cull necessary? Or is it bureaucracy gone wild?
CFIA’s Side of the Story
The CFIA isn’t out to get farmers. Their job is disease prevention—and they follow international protocols for a reason. H5N1 is deadly, mutates quickly, and has crossed into mammals. If it spreads to wild birds or poultry elsewhere, the economic and ecological fallout could be huge.
So from their view, this isn’t just about 400 birds. It’s about a biosecurity perimeter. One gap, and you risk an outbreak that spirals. They also say courts shouldn’t second-guess scientific decisions made during active threats.
And they’re not entirely wrong. But they also haven’t publicly explained why alternative testing or isolation wasn’t enough. That silence is part of what’s driving the backlash.
So Where Are We Now?
As of mid-July 2025, the appeal is live. The birds are still alive. The pressure is mounting on both sides.
If the farm wins, it could change how Canada approaches outbreak management—maybe even loosen strict culling policies for certain species. If they lose, the CFIA likely moves in fast.
Either way, this isn’t the end of the story. It’s a loud, messy, emotional case that’s forcing some big questions into the spotlight.
What’s the cost of certainty? When do safety protocols turn into cruelty? And what happens when real-world data clashes with government playbooks?
Sometimes, it starts with 400 ostriches in a quiet part of British Columbia.
Post a Comment